Prediction of Paul Mcnamee vs Charles Bud Cox Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Mcnamee vs C. Bud Cox
Paul Mcnamee
AUS
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
71
Age
65
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
24
Best Rank
149
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Charles Bud Cox
USA
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
71
Age
65
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
24
Best Rank
149
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Mcnamee 1 - 0 Cox
They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 2 and Charles Bud Cox winning 0. The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Charles Bud Cox was at the Adelaide, 28-12-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcnamee | 1 |
| Cox | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R3) Adelaide(12-28-87)
Paul Mcnamee
6
6
Charles Bud Cox
1
2
P. Mcnamee vs C. B. Cox H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.74% (260-233) | Career Total W/L | 40.54% (30-44) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Mcnamee vs C. B. Cox Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Charles Bud Cox has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Mcnamee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Charles Bud Cox has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Charles Bud Cox has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Charles Bud Cox winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 63/49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/39). Charles Bud Cox has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 14/18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Charles Bud Cox has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul Mcnamee winning 1 times and Charles Bud Cox being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 2 and Charles Bud Cox winning 0.
- The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Charles Bud Cox was at the Adelaide, 28-12-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Mcnamee has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Charles Bud Cox has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Charles Bud Cox has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Charles Bud Cox has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Paul Mcnamee vs Charles Bud Cox Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Mcnamee vs C. B. Cox H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Mcnamee 0%, Cox 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mcnamee 0%, Cox 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Mcnamee 0%, Cox 0%.
P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Open - 11-01-1988 | ||||
R3 Pat CashP. Cash | L | 6-1 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon | W | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva | W | 6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET | ||
| Adelaide - 28-12-1987 | ||||
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
C. B. Cox Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 San Luis Potosi CH - 29-03-1988 | ||||
R3  Jaime TeandonJ. Teandon | L | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Nairobi CH - 22-02-1988 | ||||
R3  Glenny SchaapG. Schaap | W | 4-6 7-6 15-13 | ||
R4  Giovanni Lelli MamiG. Lelli | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
 Liege CH - 15-02-1988 | ||||
R3  Wolfgang PoppW. Popp | L | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Guaruja - 25-01-1988 | ||||
R3  Cesar KistC. Kist | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
P. Mcnamee vs C. B. Cox Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.74% (260/233) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.54% (30/44) |
| 51.88% (662/614) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.78% (77/103) |
| 50.55% (6201/6067) | Games Win/Loss | 48.23% (883/948) |
| 47.30% (35/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.18% (14/20) |
| 53.16% (126/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.75% (14/18) |
| 51.43% (36/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 56.25% (63/49) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 527.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.18 |
| 53.57% (45/39) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 64.71% (11/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.57% (178/174) | Main Tour W/L | 28.57% (6/15) |
| 93.33% (14/1) | Challenger W/L | 47.92% (23/25) |
| 53% (204/387) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (29/69) |
| 54% (55/102) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 52% (74/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 86% (258/221) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (27/20) |
| 14% (258/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (27/7) |
| 17% (234/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (45/9) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionJ. SinnerB. SheltonW1
1.067
W2
9.7
08:00 PM 14/11/25
Prediction
R. A. Burruchaga6M. Navone2W1
2.88
W2
1.35
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionC. Stebe
A. MartinezW1
1.42
W2
2.61
10:30 PM 13/11/25
PredictionC. AlcarazL. MusettiW1
1.14
W2
6.15
07:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionD. Blanch
A. AzkaraW1
1.24
W2
3.56
09:00 AM 14/11/25
Prediction
K. UchidaS. Shimabukuro3W1
2.72
W2
1.39
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
13 Nov 2025
Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Vit Kopriva Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 13, 2025
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor FritzAlex De Minaur16:00
H2H 5-5
Alexander Zverev
Felix Auger Aliassime13:30
H2H 6-3
Jannik SinnerBen Shelton12:00
H2H 7-1
Carlos AlcarazLorenzo Musetti22:30
H2H 6-1
Dan AddedKyrian Jacquet19:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal